Evaluation · Switching
Prove coexistence before you plan a migration.
Start with one workflow, 10 questions, and the systems and reviewers you already use. The first decision is whether Spotonix changes the work enough to earn a broader rollout.
What stays in place
Evaluate around your existing investments.
Data estate
Keep the warehouse and source systems.
Start with a bounded data slice and configured connection rather than proposing a data migration as the proof.
Semantic work
Keep the models and definitions your team maintains.
Use supported context inputs and document exact exclusions instead of recreating every definition before evaluation.
Human workflow
Keep reviewers and escalation paths in place.
The proof should measure where expert work changes, not remove responsible people before the behavior is understood.
The evaluation path
Five steps to a reversible decision.
01
Choose 10 questions.
Include repeated, ambiguous, high-intervention, and consequential questions from one real workflow.
02
Freeze the comparison boundary.
Use the same data slice, starting context, reviewers, evidence requirements, and time window.
03
Run the current path.
Record preparation, handoffs, retries, expert interventions, corrections, failures, and available evidence.
04
Run the Spotonix path.
Inspect clarification, the analytical plan, concept origins, generated logic or SQL, sources, artifacts, and corrections.
05
Decide the next boundary.
Expand, coexist, revise the workflow, or stop based on named evidence—not migration momentum.
Migration guardrails
Keep the proof bounded, honest, and reversible.
No rip-and-replace premise
A proof does not require decommissioning BI or semantic systems.
The first decision is whether Spotonix improves one bounded workflow enough to earn a next step.
No hidden lock-in
Record retained artifacts and exit requirements before starting.
Define access removal, deletion, export needs, rollback, and the owner of each action for the engagement.
No adoption theater
Measure the people and work, not only response time.
Include reviewer burden, corrections, explanation quality, failed questions, and what users actually choose to reuse.
Prepare the proof
Use the same rubric across the current and Spotonix paths.
Evaluate directly
Start with the current workflow still intact.
A proof should leave you with evidence, a documented boundary, and a reversible next decision—not a migration dependency.
Book DemoSee how it works